Wine import tax: Make American Wine Great Again?
Economic policy has about as much clarity as a tank of Puligny after batonnage right now. There’s some reasonable certainty about various reforms (ahem, tax cuts) but one area that is shrouded in mystery: how imports will be taxed.
Trump made trade a big issue in the campaign and has continued in the same vein, doing industrial policy via Twitter since the election. Some policy wonks think that a huge change in the tax on imports may be forthcoming. A House bill from last year sought to impose punitive tariffs on imports to shame big box retailers such as Walmart, Home Depot and Target in their purchases from abroad.
Neil Irwin, writing in Sunday’s NYT sums up a relevant part of the destination-cased cash flow system:
A company that spent $80 making something that it sold overseas for $100 would pay no tax on its earnings. A company that imported goods worth $80 from abroad and them sold them domestically for $100 would pay tax on the full $100.
Perhaps there would be a carve-out for wine and gourmet items from abroad? Who knows. It’s not clear if this bill was targeting the retailers as importers or retailers, a key distinction in the wine world since the two “tiers†are (mostly) legally separated. Either way, about one out of every three bottles of wine consumed in America comes from overseas and could be subject to a new import tax, if one becomes law. In certain areas, such as New York City, it’s more than one out of every three bottles that is imported. And certain wine lists and shops feature imports as perhaps eight or nine out of every ten bottles on the shelf/list.
Would such tariffs be legal under the WTO? Does Trump care? Would there be retaliation against US products in overseas markets? Again, not a lot of clarity here.
But if there were a wine import tax or “border adjustments,” would it make American wine better? Probably not. US producers cannot make enough wine to keep up with US consumption. And stylistically, imports can be quite different. So it might be craft beer producers that emerge as the real winners of such a policy.
Again, there’s so little that’s been fleshed out beyond 140 character nuggets or campaign epithets. More will come in the coming weeks and months. Until then, drink up, foreign or domestic.
On January 10th, 2017 at 2:51 pm ,August Hurtel wrote:
Pull the additives out of California wine, and they’d be great again.
On January 11th, 2017 at 9:35 am ,Robin C wrote:
Trump has his own winery. Wouldn’t that be a conflict of interests?
On January 11th, 2017 at 1:59 pm ,Henry C wrote:
I’m buying as much as I can now before this “wine-sanity” strikes. Business wise it will be good for non-Napa western wines.
On January 11th, 2017 at 3:00 pm ,Victor Honore wrote:
What retaliation? Imported wines are are already taxed heavily in the top wine producing countries.
On January 18th, 2017 at 10:25 am ,Ash West wrote:
Doesn’t the government have plenty of other things to do besides messing with our beverages?
On January 25th, 2017 at 2:34 am ,Homer Parker wrote:
Imported wines are always having the highest price in most of the top countries. No one can’t be against this. Its really surpirsing that Trump has turned over these beverages as his first step.
Lets see what is going to be the result of this step.