“Prolific wine counterfeiter” Rudy Kurniawan found guilty

rudy kurniawan The jury has returned a verdict: Rudy Kurniawan has been found guilty of selling counterfeit wine through the mail and engaging in wire fraud. Judge Richard Berman will announce the sentencing on April 24; Kurniawan could spend 40 years in federal prison.

I returned to the Moynihan courthouse yesterday in hopes that the jury would begin their deliberations, but the proceedings dragged on and the jury was dismissed for the day only to begin their deliberations today. The prosecution rested on Monday, and yesterday the defense brought one witness, C. Robert Collins, a former wine importer. Among other things, Collins admitted over almost two hours that almost all the bottles he inspected as evidence were fakes, he defended Patriarche as having good wines in their cellars, and disputed whether a 1923 Roumier bottling should be dismissed as a fake prima facie even though the domaine only came into existence in 1924.

Joseph Facciponti presented a terrific defense summation for the prosecution and included easy-to-follow powerpoint slides. He argued that the defendant’s “magic cellar” produced such rare wines that the families of the domaines didn’t even know they existed. “The magic show worked for a while,” Facciponti said. “But there was no magic, only lies, smoke and mirrors.” He said that over the period 2004 – 2012, Kurniawan was a “prolific wine counterfeiter in his home” who created a witch’s brew of concoctions that the prosecution had compiled into a “mountain of evidence.” He was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, Facciponti argued, and he was motivated by greed. One thing that is not in dispute in the trial is that the defendant sold fake wines and “we know from the evidence that he was making them.”

As to the defense’s suggestion that Kurniawan was using the labels and corks as part of a home improvement project, Facciponti said “that’s preposterous.”

The prosecution showed that Kurniawan lied three times in an application for a $3 million loan from Fine Art Capital. He lied about his immigration status, saying he was a permanent resident when an immigration judge actually denied his petition for asylum in 2001 and ordered him to leave the country. He also understated his expenditures and outstanding debts.

The defense attorney, Jerome Mooney, mounted a free-wheeling, 55-minute summation in which portrayed Kurniawan as a victim in a wine world awash in fakes. He suggested that Kurniawan was “obsessive,” “keeping everything,” and trying to make the old bottles better, adding wax here and there to chipped capsules. Should he have done that? “Probably not,” Money said comparing it to innocent collectors on the PBS show “Antique Roadshow.” He suggested that Kurniawan wanted to be part of the club of collectors. As to the fake Ponsot bottles he tried to sell in 2008, he didn’t want to name his Indonesian source of fake Ponsot wines out of “danger” to that person.

US Attorney Jason Hernandez rebutted these points saying that Kurniawan lied to Fine Art Capital when he had separately said in an email that he was in deep S-H-I-T financially. He lied to Jancis Robinson in a story to make him look as if he were fighting counterfeiting. Why write did he write Eric Greenberg and say he could “move” his suspect Bordeaux for him. Why did he pay a 5% commission to Antonio Castanos, to try to sell more wine at auction in 2012 while telling him not to reveal the source?

“If you think the defendant was merely polishing bottles in his home, then you must think that next week a man in a white beard is going to come down your chimney and leave you a case of ’45 Domaine de la Romanée-Conti,” Hernandez said.

The jury deliberations took less than two hours. Pete Hellman, who has done a great job covering the trial (and counterfeiting more generally) for Wine Spectator, writes that Rudy didn’t flinch as the verdict was read.

On human interest level, none of his friends or family appeared in the court yesterday, which could have been the last day in a long time that they could have seen him. It will be interesting if he will appeal or even if he will claim inadequate representation. Mooney was Kurniawan’s second legal team; Michael Proctor represented Kurniawan at first. No reason for the split was disclosed.

It remains to be seen what the Department of Justice will do with this verdict in hand. (Attorneys Hernandez and Facciponti deserve some fine Burgundy tonight as they did an extremely thorough job with this case.) Clearly, Rudy Kurniawan–whose own biography has many holes–had accomplices to varying degrees. Clearly, he is not the only fake wine producer in the world. In many ways, counterfeit wine is the perfect crime since trophy bottles are often traded and flipped; even when the corks are pulled, the drinker may not know if it is the genuine article.

No matter what the feds do going forward, the Rudy Kurniawan saga has been one heck of a story.

pixel

8 Responses to ““Prolific wine counterfeiter” Rudy Kurniawan found guilty”


  1. Great reporting, very informative. You did your Uncle Stewart proud!


  2. Surprised that there are not many comments on this.

    Good job reporting, DR!


  3. […] “No matter what the feds do going forward, the Rudy Kurniawan saga has been one heck of a story.” Tyler Colman offers some commentary. […]


  4. […] looming for Trappist beers as Belgium’s band of brotherly brewers dies off – Independent “Prolific wine counterfeiter” Rudy Kurniawan found guilty – Dr. Vino What Would You Say Today to Your Younger Wine-Self? – Wine Spectator Man […]


  5. Thanks for the kind words, John and Daniel!


  6. Btw, the defense lawyer will seek an appeal (on the basis of the search at Kurniawan’s home, a point he didn’t bring up in the trial). Here’s an overview of the trial in the NYT:
    http://t.co/aAHsXIkRn9

    And one from Bloomberg:
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-18/wine-merchant-kurniawan-convicted-of-counterfeiting-in-new-york.html

    Mike has had some good postings about the trial on his site:
    http://winediarist.com/kurniawan-trial-koch-unplugged-wine-fuhrers-and-a-baffling-omission-from-the-witness-list/

    http://winediarist.com/kurniawan-connoisseurs-and-the-selective-deception-hypothesis/


  7. […] now, you’ll probably have heard that alleged fine wine counterfeiter Rudy Kurniawan has been found guilty of fraud in court (well, he was found guilty of wine fraud during trial in court, not found guilty within a […]


  8. […] to the Rudy Kurniwan trial, which has been covered in nearly every news outlet there is. In short, Rudy Kurniawan has been found guilty of selling counterfeit wine through the mail and engaging in wire […]


winepoliticsamz

Wine Maps


Classes

My next NYU wine classes: NYU

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

See my op-eds in the NYT
"Drink Outside the Box"
"Red, White, and Green"

Highlights

Monthly Archives

Categories


Blog posts via email


@drvino








Wine industry jobs

quotes

One of the “fresh voices taking wine journalism in new and important directions.” -World of Fine Wine

“His reporting over the past six months has had seismic consequences, which is a hell of an accomplishment for a blog.” -Forbes.com

"News of such activities, reported last month on a wine blog called Dr. Vino, have captivated wine enthusiasts and triggered a fierce online debate…" The Wall Street Journal

"...well-written, well-researched, calm and, dare we use the word, sober." -Dorothy Gaiter & John Brecher, WSJ

jbf07James Beard Foundation awards

Saveur, best drinks blog, finalist 2012.

Winner, Best Wine Blog

One of the "seven best wine blogs." Food & Wine,

One of the three best wine blogs, Fast Company

See more media...

ayow150buy

Wine books on Amazon: