Comments on: A Bridge Runs through It – Mosel edition

By: Bernadette

Bernadette — Fri, 25 May 2012 20:38:18 +0000

Hideous ….great word for this plan. How much money spent to shave off/save 30mins….not an intelligent plan in my opinion. Instead invest the money in the Mosel so people wont wish to pass through it to get on a plane.

By: Cositas y cosotas: 18.09.2009 « La otra botella

Cositas y cosotas: 18.09.2009 « La otra botella — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:48:21 +0000

[...] para algunos de los viñedos más preciados del Mosela. Piezas de Mike Steinberger en Slate y Dr. Vino (en esta última ha comentado ya nuestro amigo Felipe Méndez de un modo que considero francamente [...]

By: Robert Simonson

Robert Simonson — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:10:37 +0000

What a hideously stupid idea.

Felipe: just look at the rendering. The image of that bridge defacing the view of the river and surrounding landscape is deleterious enough. It hurts the eyes and the soul. And honestly, are you calling that thing a great piece of architecture on par with the Roman aqueducts?

By: Dylan

Dylan — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:06:49 +0000

30 minutes shorter and it will reduce the amount of possible drinking and driving. This plan has it all figured out, doesn’t it?

By: Felipe Méndez

Felipe Méndez — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:38:49 +0000

Is there any evidence that the bridge IS gonna be deleterious?

I mean, if someone from the green party would have said that the now famous roman bridges was going to be harmful to the enviroment, the whole humanity would have lost great pieces of architecture and engineering.

By: Francesco

Francesco — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:03:49 +0000

On the upside, maybe the passing traffic will create enough breeze to deter some frost, haha j/k. This project would be a real shame…

By: 1WineDude

1WineDude — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:06:38 +0000

Yikes!