<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From Japan, observations about wine, carbon and classrooms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drvino.com/2008/05/01/from-japan-observations-about-wine-carbon-and-classrooms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/05/01/from-japan-observations-about-wine-carbon-and-classrooms/</link>
	<description>wine talk that goes down easy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/05/01/from-japan-observations-about-wine-carbon-and-classrooms/#comment-95582</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drvino.com/?p=1680#comment-95582</guid>
		<description>While I enjoyed your article on the carbon footprint of a bottle of wine, I would like to see the analysis carried throughout the entire lifecycle.  The analysis considered the carbon footprint of the bottle of wine for it to be delivered from a winery to a particular location.  The carbon footprint for that bottle does not stop growing there.  The wine has to be purchased.  How big is the carbon footprint for the purchase transaction?  It depends on the price and how the money was earned.  For fine and exotic wines, earning the money to purchase the wine may be the largest overall carbon contribution.  This means all other things being equal, a wine costing several hundred dollars has a significantly larger environmental impact that a wine costing $10.  I am not to saying that we should all stop drinking fine wine.  I just think we should be aware of the total price we are paying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I enjoyed your article on the carbon footprint of a bottle of wine, I would like to see the analysis carried throughout the entire lifecycle.  The analysis considered the carbon footprint of the bottle of wine for it to be delivered from a winery to a particular location.  The carbon footprint for that bottle does not stop growing there.  The wine has to be purchased.  How big is the carbon footprint for the purchase transaction?  It depends on the price and how the money was earned.  For fine and exotic wines, earning the money to purchase the wine may be the largest overall carbon contribution.  This means all other things being equal, a wine costing several hundred dollars has a significantly larger environmental impact that a wine costing $10.  I am not to saying that we should all stop drinking fine wine.  I just think we should be aware of the total price we are paying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Vino</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/05/01/from-japan-observations-about-wine-carbon-and-classrooms/#comment-93644</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Vino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 03:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drvino.com/?p=1680#comment-93644</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan, 

It's really mostly about the mass (weight).

TetraPak and other box wines reduce the weight of the packaging material but they also do increase the packing efficiency in the shipping container. But it's really just about how much energy it takes to move that container and then how many GHGs (greenhouse gases) are emitted as a result of the energy used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan, </p>
<p>It&#8217;s really mostly about the mass (weight).</p>
<p>TetraPak and other box wines reduce the weight of the packaging material but they also do increase the packing efficiency in the shipping container. But it&#8217;s really just about how much energy it takes to move that container and then how many GHGs (greenhouse gases) are emitted as a result of the energy used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/05/01/from-japan-observations-about-wine-carbon-and-classrooms/#comment-92835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 20:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drvino.com/?p=1680#comment-92835</guid>
		<description>Wow, MIT! Your research has raised eyebrows again and again, truly fantastic work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, MIT! Your research has raised eyebrows again and again, truly fantastic work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Penrod</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/05/01/from-japan-observations-about-wine-carbon-and-classrooms/#comment-92686</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Penrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 15:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.drvino.com/?p=1680#comment-92686</guid>
		<description>Dr Vino has your research looked at how much carbon could be saved by changing the shape of the bottle?  A long thin bottle will use more glass than a short fat bottle.  So a short fat bottle should weigh less, and cost less carbon to transport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Vino has your research looked at how much carbon could be saved by changing the shape of the bottle?  A long thin bottle will use more glass than a short fat bottle.  So a short fat bottle should weigh less, and cost less carbon to transport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.420 seconds -->
