<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This blog came THIS close to a mention in the NYer, WSJ!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/</link>
	<description>wine talk that goes down easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 01:55:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jared</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-74415</link>
		<dc:creator>jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-74415</guid>
		<description>Tyler, have you had your paper peer reviewed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler, have you had your paper peer reviewed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jared</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-74407</link>
		<dc:creator>jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 07:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-74407</guid>
		<description>From the research paper:
&quot;Compared to many other crops, grapes yield relatively little output per hectare. Grapes considered in this study yielded between 400 and 800 kilograms (kg) per hectare&quot;

800 kg = 1763 lbs = 0.88 tons per hectare
= 0.35 tons per acre (2.5 acres per hectare).

so the paper is saying that vineyards yield between 0.18 and 0.35 tons per acre. that&#039;s simply false.

typical vineyards in california yield 2-5 tons per acre, and vineyards in the central valley can yield up to 10 tons per acre.  

am i missing something here? Tyler check your numbers please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the research paper:<br />
&#8220;Compared to many other crops, grapes yield relatively little output per hectare. Grapes considered in this study yielded between 400 and 800 kilograms (kg) per hectare&#8221;</p>
<p>800 kg = 1763 lbs = 0.88 tons per hectare<br />
= 0.35 tons per acre (2.5 acres per hectare).</p>
<p>so the paper is saying that vineyards yield between 0.18 and 0.35 tons per acre. that&#8217;s simply false.</p>
<p>typical vineyards in california yield 2-5 tons per acre, and vineyards in the central valley can yield up to 10 tons per acre.  </p>
<p>am i missing something here? Tyler check your numbers please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-73009</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-73009</guid>
		<description>You were mentioned quite a few times at the Global Climate Change and Wine conference, though not your blog. It was funny though having them talk of Tyler and for a second I thought, &quot;huh, wonder who he is&quot; then me and Gabriella turned to each other and mouthed &quot;Dr.Vino!&quot;
Glad to see your efforts getting talked about!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were mentioned quite a few times at the Global Climate Change and Wine conference, though not your blog. It was funny though having them talk of Tyler and for a second I thought, &#8220;huh, wonder who he is&#8221; then me and Gabriella turned to each other and mouthed &#8220;Dr.Vino!&#8221;<br />
Glad to see your efforts getting talked about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72853</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72853</guid>
		<description>Actually, the New Yorker article preceded the U.N. leak about the 3x worse shipping CO2 reality, so it really does warrant a re-calculation of your numbers, to be honest.  Furthermore, the claim that &quot;you don&#039;t have to build highways to berth a ship&quot; is a crock of bad vinegar, because the ship building industry requires heavy use of trucks and highways to move (from source to port) the steel, wood, supplies, even fabric for your romantic but completely irrelevant sailboat, a fad of whisking wine from France to Ireland in &quot;just&quot; four days. And only 60,000 bottles at a time? Sure it&#039;s a start, but seriously? There are supermarket chains with that much wine on pallets in the warehouse. It&#039;s inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. Come on, Dr. V.... we have a long way to go, all fun and games aside, the shipment of heavy glass bottles via diesel barge across the Atlantic is hardly &quot;sustainable&quot; or laudable.  We should all be open to swifter change. And given the groundbreaking news about the 3x greater impacts of oceanic freight than previously known, we need to take a deeper look at our vino&#039;s venture from vineyard to corkage. (twistage? what is it now with these screw tops?)  Sure, power plants and such need a larger kick in the pants, but every sector needs to rethink its impact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the New Yorker article preceded the U.N. leak about the 3x worse shipping CO2 reality, so it really does warrant a re-calculation of your numbers, to be honest.  Furthermore, the claim that &#8220;you don&#8217;t have to build highways to berth a ship&#8221; is a crock of bad vinegar, because the ship building industry requires heavy use of trucks and highways to move (from source to port) the steel, wood, supplies, even fabric for your romantic but completely irrelevant sailboat, a fad of whisking wine from France to Ireland in &#8220;just&#8221; four days. And only 60,000 bottles at a time? Sure it&#8217;s a start, but seriously? There are supermarket chains with that much wine on pallets in the warehouse. It&#8217;s inconsequential in the grand scheme of things. Come on, Dr. V&#8230;. we have a long way to go, all fun and games aside, the shipment of heavy glass bottles via diesel barge across the Atlantic is hardly &#8220;sustainable&#8221; or laudable.  We should all be open to swifter change. And given the groundbreaking news about the 3x greater impacts of oceanic freight than previously known, we need to take a deeper look at our vino&#8217;s venture from vineyard to corkage. (twistage? what is it now with these screw tops?)  Sure, power plants and such need a larger kick in the pants, but every sector needs to rethink its impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Vino</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72706</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Vino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72706</guid>
		<description>btw, they could always revert to sail!!

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hChoVlzhW91rwuf7KKwDc46aKJvA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, they could always revert to sail!!</p>
<p><a href="http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hChoVlzhW91rwuf7KKwDc46aKJvA" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hChoVlzhW91rwuf7KKwDc46aKJvA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Vino</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72699</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Vino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 02:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72699</guid>
		<description>My co-author runs these kind of calculations every day so I am sure that he us up on the latest. Still, as the New Yorker article said, you don&#039;t have to build a highway to berth a ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My co-author runs these kind of calculations every day so I am sure that he us up on the latest. Still, as the New Yorker article said, you don&#8217;t have to build a highway to berth a ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BD</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72649</link>
		<dc:creator>BD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72649</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your work, but I think you should address the new shipping CO2 revelations as soon as possible.  If it really is 3x worse than previously believed, that warrants a re-calculation of your numbers, accordingly.  Don&#039;t you agree?
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your work, but I think you should address the new shipping CO2 revelations as soon as possible.  If it really is 3x worse than previously believed, that warrants a re-calculation of your numbers, accordingly.  Don&#8217;t you agree?<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72577</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72577</guid>
		<description>We are in the process of setting up a &quot;Carbon Free&#039; shipping mechanism through www.carbonfund.org. As far as I am aware, this will make us the first company to ship wine &#039;Carbon Free&#039; in the U.S. I will be adding an article to my blog in the next few days that will address the issue more specifically. This is a great program that enables shippers to offset their carbon emissions by purchasing offsets through Carbon Fund.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are in the process of setting up a &#8220;Carbon Free&#8217; shipping mechanism through <a href="http://www.carbonfund.org" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">http://www.carbonfund.org</a>. As far as I am aware, this will make us the first company to ship wine &#8216;Carbon Free&#8217; in the U.S. I will be adding an article to my blog in the next few days that will address the issue more specifically. This is a great program that enables shippers to offset their carbon emissions by purchasing offsets through Carbon Fund.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72574</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2008/02/20/this-blog-came-this-close-to-a-mention-in-the-nyer-wsj/#comment-72574</guid>
		<description>Hi There,

I&#039;ve seen a couple of articles about the carbon emissions from ocean going shipping being 3 times higher than previously thought. Have you seen this ? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/02/13/eaship113.xml

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi There,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a couple of articles about the carbon emissions from ocean going shipping being 3 times higher than previously thought. Have you seen this ? <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/02/13/eaship113.xml" rel="nofollow" class="liexternal">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/02/13/eaship113.xml</a></p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
