<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federally funded grape research? It&#8217;s peanuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/</link>
	<description>wine talk that goes down easy</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/#comment-29904</link>
		<dc:creator>John Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/#comment-29904</guid>
		<description>This is awesome! I agree that it is great news and new news, I had no idea. I think it would be fare to do something similar to the Australian Wine Research institute and have it partially funded by the wineries. I believe the way they have it setup is they pay a fee/tax based on the amout of gallons they produce annually. In this sort of system everyone has an equal share in the research regardless of size, which I can see may be a problem as you point out for the 4,970 odd "little guy" wineries.

Good article.
John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome! I agree that it is great news and new news, I had no idea. I think it would be fare to do something similar to the Australian Wine Research institute and have it partially funded by the wineries. I believe the way they have it setup is they pay a fee/tax based on the amout of gallons they produce annually. In this sort of system everyone has an equal share in the research regardless of size, which I can see may be a problem as you point out for the 4,970 odd &#8220;little guy&#8221; wineries.</p>
<p>Good article.<br />
John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swirlingnotions</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/#comment-29771</link>
		<dc:creator>swirlingnotions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/#comment-29771</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post. I'm so glad you're writing this stuff. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post. I&#8217;m so glad you&#8217;re writing this stuff. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wine Biz Radio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wine Biz Radio: October 29, 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/#comment-29628</link>
		<dc:creator>Wine Biz Radio &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wine Biz Radio: October 29, 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drvino.com/2007/10/29/federally-funded-grape-research-its-peanuts/#comment-29628</guid>
		<description>[...] Wine research in the U.S. is basically a rounding error [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wine research in the U.S. is basically a rounding error [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
