Getting plowed: Sonoma forests to vineyards
First time here? Check out the "site highlights," send in a question, subscribe to the latest posts by RSS, daily email, or free monthly updates by email (right sidebar). Thanks for visiting!
In last week’s posting about the carbon footprint of wine, I intentionally just focused on the often overlooked and carbon-intensive distribution aspects. But certainly the vineyard and winery practices need to be considered as well when looking at the environmental impact of wine.
No practice might have more impact on the environment than the act of making a vineyard out of forest. A four-minute film from the Sierra Club (thanks, Jack!) demonstrates some of this deforestation/vineyard construction in Sonoma. Using images from Google Earth, they document some vineyards already carved out of forests. Then they discuss the Premier Pacific Vineyard’s proposed development of close to 2,000 acres of forest land for 90-acre “vineyard estates,” or residences set among the vines.
On their website, Premier Pacific has a statement of environmental responsibility and commitment to sustainability:
Premier Pacific appreciates its unique opportunity to help protect the environment. We take our mandate as a responsible steward of the land seriously and have invested considerable time and resources toward designing each vineyard to be as sustainable and low impact as possible…Sustainable practices are not just environmentally responsible, but less intrusive, more natural vineyard management techniques that are being recognized as an important part of growing luxury wine.
Check out the video clip (click here if the above does not work) and feel free to sound off in the comments.
Related: ” Sonoma Coast winemakers living on the edge” [NYT]
One of the "seven best wine blogs." 
One of the three best wine blogs
On May 12th, 2007 at 3:59 pm ,damiano wrote:
Who are the investors in PPV?
I remember a Californian pension fund.
Ciao
On May 30th, 2007 at 12:30 pm ,St. Vini wrote:
“No practice might have more impact on the environment than the act of making a vineyard out of forest.”
That seems a bit inflammatory, doesn’t it? Would they prefer housing developments?
V
On May 30th, 2007 at 12:59 pm ,Dr. Vino wrote:
Hey V,
True, it would be hard to argue that a vineyard does more harm than a housing development. But I was just talking about vineyard practices. So in the realm of applying chemical fertilizers and using pesticides, yes, I’d argue that carving a vineyard out of a mature forest would have the greatest negative impact.
On August 18th, 2007 at 3:48 pm ,anythingnatural wrote:
We have been telling ourself lies about land development and econmic development for a long time. Are not the effects of Global Warming and the War for Oil a direct result of our greed and lack of stewardship? Once developed (either for housing or vineyards) the land WILL NEVER return to forest. The VERY reason most of us live in Sonoma County is the land! Let’s not argue over symantics, protect our forests and rivers (while we still have the chance).