<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the point?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/</link>
	<description>wine talk that goes down easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: huevosconvino</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>huevosconvino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a quantitative, scientific person by nature, but when it comes to my wine reviews I prefer to take copious notes and not give each wine a score.  So I guess I&#039;m more qualitative when it comes to describing the wines I drink.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a quantitative, scientific person by nature, but when it comes to my wine reviews I prefer to take copious notes and not give each wine a score.  So I guess I&#8217;m more qualitative when it comes to describing the wines I drink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Vino</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Vino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey thanks for all these comments! Although I don&#039;t use numerical ratings, I somehow figured that the comments would be dominated by people in favor of numbers. I guess there&#039;s some selection bias here since you&#039;re already reading this blog.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Dr. Debs, I thought the comment was interesting too since it shows at least one unwilling participant in &quot;the score.&quot; A crack in the facade? &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;And just a note to the (several) commenters here who have Blogger blogs: unless you want people going to your &quot;about&quot; page, try clicking &quot;other&quot; in the &quot;choose an identity&quot; prompt. Then you can put in your handle and a direct link back to your blog.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Cheers,&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Tyler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey thanks for all these comments! Although I don&#8217;t use numerical ratings, I somehow figured that the comments would be dominated by people in favor of numbers. I guess there&#8217;s some selection bias here since you&#8217;re already reading this blog.</p>
<p>Dr. Debs, I thought the comment was interesting too since it shows at least one unwilling participant in &#8220;the score.&#8221; A crack in the facade? </p>
<p>And just a note to the (several) commenters here who have Blogger blogs: unless you want people going to your &#8220;about&#8221; page, try clicking &#8220;other&#8221; in the &#8220;choose an identity&#8221; prompt. Then you can put in your handle and a direct link back to your blog.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Tyler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cru Master</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Cru Master</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[numbers have their place in everything - hell you can even create a beautiful piece of art if you use &#039;colour by numbers&#039;!!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;But you dont describe art using numbers  - and while wine&#039;s creation is routed in science, it deserves the open interpretation words give it. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I&#039;m a fan of describing the wine and more importantly for me, understanding  how it was made and the experience of drinking it.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;We admire the Sistine Chapel because we know it took Mickie boy four years on his back to paint it - add that knowledge to the true visual splendor and you have a masterpiece.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Same with a great wine...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>numbers have their place in everything &#8211; hell you can even create a beautiful piece of art if you use &#8216;colour by numbers&#8217;!!</p>
<p>But you dont describe art using numbers  &#8211; and while wine&#8217;s creation is routed in science, it deserves the open interpretation words give it. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a fan of describing the wine and more importantly for me, understanding  how it was made and the experience of drinking it.</p>
<p>We admire the Sistine Chapel because we know it took Mickie boy four years on his back to paint it &#8211; add that knowledge to the true visual splendor and you have a masterpiece.</p>
<p>Same with a great wine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my opinion, scoring is both an art and a science. Like scoring a figure skater, there is the technical component and the artistic component. Find a taster with similar tastes, and use the score as a quality metric. I don&#039;t think there is anything wrong with a score per se, but a score without context (a taster you like combined with a detailed tasting note) is pretty much useless. Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, scoring is both an art and a science. Like scoring a figure skater, there is the technical component and the artistic component. Find a taster with similar tastes, and use the score as a quality metric. I don&#8217;t think there is anything wrong with a score per se, but a score without context (a taster you like combined with a detailed tasting note) is pretty much useless. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Sharp</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-733</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Sharp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t used them for over ten years. &lt;BR/&gt;They are effective in teaching people that wines do have different quality levels however.Some people think it&#039;s all the same.&lt;BR/&gt;What I really don&#039;t like about number systems is how half the scale is redundant usually. Any form of liquid is a shoe in for some sort of score so long as it shoes up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t used them for over ten years. <br />They are effective in teaching people that wines do have different quality levels however.Some people think it&#8217;s all the same.<br />What I really don&#8217;t like about number systems is how half the scale is redundant usually. Any form of liquid is a shoe in for some sort of score so long as it shoes up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Debs</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Debs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What fascinates me is the objectivity remark. I think this is why people love to get points on a wine. Numbers give a (false) sense of objective criteria being used. The problem is, that you use five very subjective senses to determine how well or badly a wine fulfills those &quot;objective criteria.&quot; Talk about a mismatch! I&#039;m with Sonadora: more good descriptions, less numbers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What fascinates me is the objectivity remark. I think this is why people love to get points on a wine. Numbers give a (false) sense of objective criteria being used. The problem is, that you use five very subjective senses to determine how well or badly a wine fulfills those &#8220;objective criteria.&#8221; Talk about a mismatch! I&#8217;m with Sonadora: more good descriptions, less numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call me a big dork, but I like grades, like B+, A-, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me a big dork, but I like grades, like B+, A-, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-736</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my wine journal, I keep things as simple as possible. Next to the name of the wine, I either have a checkmark, or an X. If there is a checkmark, I always include some kind of context: Why I liked it, what I ate with it, etc. For me, even the best of wines are still contextual. In one environment I&#039;ve liked a particular wine, and in a different environment, felt completely different about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my wine journal, I keep things as simple as possible. Next to the name of the wine, I either have a checkmark, or an X. If there is a checkmark, I always include some kind of context: Why I liked it, what I ate with it, etc. For me, even the best of wines are still contextual. In one environment I&#8217;ve liked a particular wine, and in a different environment, felt completely different about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonadora</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-737</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonadora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t use scores to describe the wines I drink.  I don&#039;t find them very helpful for my own uses and if I can&#039;t see the value, I&#039;m not going to be able to explain it to anyone else either.  I also don&#039;t pay attention to the numerical scores given by the big magazines, I prefer a description of the wine&#039;s flavors which I find to be a better indicator of whether or not I will like it rather than simply drinking it because of a number.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use scores to describe the wines I drink.  I don&#8217;t find them very helpful for my own uses and if I can&#8217;t see the value, I&#8217;m not going to be able to explain it to anyone else either.  I also don&#8217;t pay attention to the numerical scores given by the big magazines, I prefer a description of the wine&#8217;s flavors which I find to be a better indicator of whether or not I will like it rather than simply drinking it because of a number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2007/01/17/whats-point-2/#comment-738</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 09:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2007/01/whats-point-2/#comment-738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use a number system on KensWineGuide.com because it was the only way I could average everyones opinion.  (including mine) I previously used words like Unbelievable, Excellent, Very Good, &amp; Good.  Now they all have numbers assigned.  The bottom line for me, is if 3+ qualified professionals rate a wine as Very Good or better, it is most likely Very Good or better.  The next question then is what does it cost.  If reasonable, then it is most likely a good investment and will be enjoyed more.  Just my opinion.&lt;BR/&gt;Ken]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a number system on KensWineGuide.com because it was the only way I could average everyones opinion.  (including mine) I previously used words like Unbelievable, Excellent, Very Good, &#038; Good.  Now they all have numbers assigned.  The bottom line for me, is if 3+ qualified professionals rate a wine as Very Good or better, it is most likely Very Good or better.  The next question then is what does it cost.  If reasonable, then it is most likely a good investment and will be enjoyed more.  Just my opinion.<br />Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
