<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great food wines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.drvino.com/2005/08/17/great-food-wines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.drvino.com/2005/08/17/great-food-wines/</link>
	<description>wine talk that goes down easy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:54:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2005/08/17/great-food-wines/#comment-1</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2005/08/great-food-wines/#comment-1</guid>
		<description>Not a slam, but not always a compliment, either. Some wines that I taste just call or scream out for food. And yes, these are never the over-extracted, high alcohol, hedonistic fruit bombs.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Oh, and I&#039;ve had two great Bourgueils, a 1982 and a 1989 from Pierre-Jacques Druet (about 7 and 8 years ago).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As for calling something a great wine because it matches perfectly with food, well, that&#039;s just not right with me. A very satisfying wine, yes. (And sometimes the cheap, simple wine outshines the bigger boys with a meal.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a slam, but not always a compliment, either. Some wines that I taste just call or scream out for food. And yes, these are never the over-extracted, high alcohol, hedonistic fruit bombs.</p>
<p>Oh, and I&#8217;ve had two great Bourgueils, a 1982 and a 1989 from Pierre-Jacques Druet (about 7 and 8 years ago).</p>
<p>As for calling something a great wine because it matches perfectly with food, well, that&#8217;s just not right with me. A very satisfying wine, yes. (And sometimes the cheap, simple wine outshines the bigger boys with a meal.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenn</title>
		<link>http://www.drvino.com/2005/08/17/great-food-wines/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://70.103.16.189/~drvinoco/wordpress/2005/08/great-food-wines/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Asimov definitely uses &quot;food wines&quot; as a pseudo-nice way of saying wines are of lesser quality I think. In a piece he wrote a few months ago about LI reds, he said less than complimentary things and then deemed them good food wines.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I don&#039;t consider the descriptor &quot;good food wine&quot; good OR bad. I use it as something to explain to my readers how I think a wine can best be enjoyed...or how it shines brightest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asimov definitely uses &#8220;food wines&#8221; as a pseudo-nice way of saying wines are of lesser quality I think. In a piece he wrote a few months ago about LI reds, he said less than complimentary things and then deemed them good food wines.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t consider the descriptor &#8220;good food wine&#8221; good OR bad. I use it as something to explain to my readers how I think a wine can best be enjoyed&#8230;or how it shines brightest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

